crowdog66: (Default)
Photobucket

That really doesn't require an explanation, does it, folks?
◾ Tags:
Date/Time: 2010-01-18 01:48 (UTC)Posted by: [identity profile] dark-puck.livejournal.com
...what is that I don't even.
Date/Time: 2010-01-18 02:04 (UTC)Posted by: [identity profile] crowdog66.livejournal.com
Complaining that OMG GAIZ LINUX KANT RUN UR COMPOOTER is only slightly more ignorant than claiming that OMG TEH APPLE OS KANT RUN UR COMPOOTER EITHER!

The fact that both operating systems are about 100 times more stable and/or elegant than any Windows OS ever created just adds to the delicious irony.
Date/Time: 2010-01-18 03:19 (UTC)Posted by: [identity profile] lindenfoxcub.livejournal.com
Wow, that`s awesome. I almost want to print it out an post it at my cubicle at work.
Date/Time: 2010-01-18 05:07 (UTC)Posted by: [identity profile] moonwolf23.livejournal.com
Yes, yes it does. Then again, it might help if I even understood some of what the hell was being written.

moonie
not a computer geek by any means.
Date/Time: 2010-01-18 15:54 (UTC)Posted by: [identity profile] crowdog66.livejournal.com
Everything the letter writer's saying about other operating systems is pretty much a lie. Apple has always had (and still has) an operating system that has nothing to do with Windows (in fact, Windows stole some stuff from THEM) and which is much more stable than Windows has ever been. And Linux can run a computer from the ground up, again more successfully than Windows.

So the letter is a demonstration of Windows jingoism and spectacular fail.
Date/Time: 2010-01-19 14:50 (UTC)Posted by: (Anonymous)
Hey, isn't this a lot like the argument in the USA that they can't run their health care system without the insurance companies?

Bell

Profile

crowdog66: (Default)
crowdog66

October 2016

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
91011121314 15
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags